Year: 2020
Type: article
Abstract: Background The NIA‐AA Research Framework for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) includes consideration of two clinical schemes for staging AD: (1) traditional cognitively unimpaired (CU) to MCI to dementia and (2) a new numeric staging (1‐6) for individuals who are on the Alzheimer’s continuum. Method The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging is a population‐based longitudinal study of aging and cognitive impairment in Olmsted County, Minnesota. We analyzed CU persons who had completed three consecutive clinical visits and calculated measures for cross‐sectional categories: objective cognitive impairment and function and measures for change including subjective cognitive impairment (SCD), objective cognitive change (ΔOBJ), and new onset of neurobehavioral symptoms (NBS). We calculated the frequencies for Stage 2 by varying the cutoffs for each of the measures above and assessed stability of this stage over 15 months. Result The frequency of Stage 2 varied from 5‐48% depending upon the age of the participants and the cutoff scores used. Membership in Stage 2 required abnormal SCD, ΔOBJ, or ΔNBS and having only ΔOBJ abnormal was the primary reason for inclusion in Stage 2 (45‐62%) followed by 10‐21% having only SCD abnormal. The stability of Stage 2 over 15 months ranged from 31‐65% with 5‐13% progressing to Stage 3 or higher and 22‐43% percent reverting to Stage 1. Conclusion Stage 2 was characterized as a transitional period between CU and MCI and could be operationalized with a variety of measures. The staging scheme performed well considering the variables evaluated and cutoff scores employed.
Source: Alzheimer s & Dementia
DOI: 10.1002/alz.040262
Institution: Mayo Clinic
Language: English
Subfield: Psychiatry and Mental health
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: bronze
OpenAlex ID: W3111921885