The Authors Reply
Year: 2020
Type: letter
Abstract: We thank Dr. Wels for his thoughtful comments (1) on our article (2). Dr. Wels raises several concerns about our analyses; we respond to each below. First, Dr. Wels argues that our use of a union-membership exposure rather than a union-contract-coverage exposure is problematic because union contracts benefit not only contract-covered union members but also contract-covered employees who are not union members. While Dr. Wels’s argument is reasonable in theory, as we noted in the article (2), US-based research suggests that using union membership as an exposure is preferable to using union-contract coverage because estimated...
Source: American Journal of Epidemiology
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwaa279
Language: English
Topic: Labor Movements and Unions
Subfield: Public Administration
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W3113432944
