Work

A Systematic Literature Review of Animal-Assisted Interventions in Oncology (Part I): Methods and Results

Year: 2020

Type: review

Abstract: Animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) use human-animal interactions to positive effect in various contexts including cancer care. As the first installment of a 2-part series, this systematic literature review focuses on the research methods and quantitative results of AAI studies in oncology. We find methodological consistency in the use of canines as therapy animals, in the types of high-risk patients excluded from studies, and in the infection precautions taken with therapy animals throughout cancer wards. The investigated patient endpoints are not significantly affected by AAI, with the exceptions of improvements in oxygen consumption, quality of life, depression, mood, and satisfaction with therapy. The AAI field in oncology has progressed significantly since its inception and has great potential to positively affect future patient outcomes. To advance the field, future research should consistently improve the methodological design of studies, report data more completely, and focus more on the therapy animal's well-being.

Source: Integrative Cancer Therapies

DOI: 10.1177/1534735420943278

Authors: Timothy R. N. Holder, Margaret E. Gruen, David L. Roberts, Tamara Somers, Alper Bozkurt

Institutions: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina State University, Duke University

Language: English

Topic: Human-Animal Interaction Studies

Subfield: Genetics

Field: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Domain: Life Sciences

SDG: Good health and well-being

Open Access status: gold

Estimated APC paid: $2,200