Year: 2021
Type: article
Abstract: The aim of this study is to determine the academic writing preferences of authors through articles published in international peer-reviewed journals and to identify those that are more frequently applied than the academic writing styles in question in field writing.55 articles published in the last three issues of the European Journal of Education Studies, Eğitim ve Bilim, Journal of Electrical Engineering and Electronics Technology and Translational Biomedicine, which have open access in the field of different research areas, were included in the research.Articles selected from different disciplines in order to diversify the sample were examined by scanning technique in terms of three styles named by the researchers considering the academic writing characteristics mentioned in the literature.For academic style, quantitative style, and populist style, the researchers established criteria based on expert opinions.The examples of the criteria in the articles of the styles subject to the research were determined and subjected to interpretation.Expert opinions were received after each finding and comment.Findings and interpretations were arranged over and over again according to expert opinions.Accordingly, the quantitative features of academic language that is nested with the style style in literature style is also separated these two, as a result, the academic and quantitative styles that can hold each other's places, populist style-related print resources should be done through investigations of more general appeal outside the academy, the traditions and habits of the authors of journals extensive freedom in expression has been shown to left field.
DOI: 10.29228/ijlet.48897
Author: Şükrü ÖZEN- Zekerya BATUR
Institution: Usak University
Language: Turkish
Subfield: Library and Information Sciences
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
SDG: Quality education
Open Access status: diamond
OpenAlex ID: W3141029561