Problems in using Beals' index to detect species trends in incomplete floristic monitoring data (Reply to Bruelheide et al. (2020))
Year: 2021
Type: article
Abstract: Bruelheide et al. (Diversity and Distributions, 26, 2020, 782) explored repeated habitat mapping data to identify floristic changes over time on the basis of two surveys. Because of the incompleteness of the data, they utilized the Beals' index based on the aggregated data from both surveys as a statistical tool for the analysis. The aim of this note is to illustrate problems of this approach, which in particular is shown to produce a systematic underestimation of species decrease (and—potentially less relevant in practice—increase). A specific set of model cases will be introduced to show the effects of unjustified usage of the Beals' index in this specific form.
Source: Diversity and Distributions
DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13276
Authors: Erik Christensen, Björn Christensen, Sören Christensen
Language: English
Subfield: Nature and Landscape Conservation
Field: Environmental Science
Domain: Physical Sciences
SDG: Life on land
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $2,200
OpenAlex ID: W3162853405
