Work

The Modal-Epistemic Argument Undefeated: Reply to Wintein

Year: 2021

Type: article

Abstract: Recently, Stefan Wintein published an article in which he presents four objections to my modal-epistemic argument for the existence of God. His first objection is an alleged counterexample to the argument’s first premise, and the second objection is an alleged counterexample to the argument’s second premise. Wintein’s third objection attempts to show that the modal-epistemic argument is circular. Finally, the fourth objection is a parody objection. In this paper, I show that Wintein’s four objections all fail.

Source: VU Research Portal

DOI: 10.1007/s11841-022-00909-0

Author: Emanuel Rutten

Language: English

Topic: Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

Subfield: Philosophy

Field: Arts and Humanities

Domain: Social Sciences

Open Access status: green

OpenAlex ID: W3163095987

FWCI:

Cites:

Cited by:

Related to: 10