Get started
Work

Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: A physicist's time is better spent in direct patient/provider interaction than in the patient's chart

Year: 2022
Type: article
Abstract: both engaging for the readership and foster further collaboration in the science and clinical practice of radiation oncology.All 3DCRT debates thus far have included a radiation oncologist, medical physicist, and radiobiologist on each team.For this debate, we break that trend and include a patient representative along with a radiation oncologist and medical physicist on each team.We hope this patient perspective adds a valuable new aspect to our debate format and encourages the continued inclusion of patient perspectives in future clinical discussions.
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13559
Authors: Todd F. Atwood, Narottam Lamichhane, Krisha Howell, Stephanie E. Weiss, Louise Bird, Charles Pearson, Michael C. Joiner, Michael M. Dominello, Jay Burmeister
Institutions: University of California San Diego, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Wayne State University, The Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
Language: English
Subfield: Radiation
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $650
OpenAlex ID: W4213152818
FWCI: 0.85
Cites: 26
Cited by: 5
Related to: 10