Exclusion of fast evolving genes or fast evolving sites produces different archaean phylogenies
Year: 2022
Type: article
Abstract: The large size of modern datasets has inspired a variety of strategies to alter genes, sites and/or species compositions to improve the accuracy of phylogenetic reconstructions. Each of these data-filtering approaches leads to the exclusion of different types of data, which is known to affect phylogenetic outcome. However, the choice of a filtering strategy is often subjective and the robustness of the results to alternative strategies is not usually investigated. A case study is provided by archaean phylogenies, that have recently relied on filtering fast evolving sites. Here we compare the outcomes of two filtering strategies: fast evolving genes or fast evolving sites to investigate the robustness of Archaea phylogenies to data manipulation. Our results show that the two approaches lead to different outcomes and that excluding fast evolving sites might not be as effective as removing fast evolving genes. Topologies obtained from filtering either fast evolving or random sites are twice as likely to be similar (72%) than those obtained from filtering fast genes (36%). Our results suggest that the phylogenies of Archaea from many recent studies may be driven by the data filtering choice and that robustness to different types of data manipulation should be systematically investigated.
Authors: A.A. Superson, F.U. Battistuzzi
Institution: Oakland University
Language: English
Subfield: Molecular Biology
Domain: Life Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $3,600
OpenAlex ID: W4213195146
