Year: 2011
Type: article
Abstract: Recently, there have been a number of responses to Ted Sider's argument in "Hell and Vagueness," which challenges the consistency of a popular view of hell with God's justice.After presenting an interpretation of the original argument, I critically examine the reply to it by Trent Dougherty and Ted Poston.I conclude that we should be suspicious of the success of their overall approach, both because it requires the truth of controversial metaphysical theses and because it does not ultimately address the heart of the worry that Sider's argument is built on.Ultimately, I present and offer a limited defense of a new response to Sider, built on a picture of consignment to hell based on having committed mortal sins that are unforgiven by God.
Source: Faith and Philosophy
Authors: Joseph Corabi, The Society of Christian Philosophers
Language: English
Subfield: Philosophy
Field: Arts and Humanities
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W4231632573