Year: 2019
Type: article
Abstract: This paper examines group speech acts to argue against the view, here called speaker intentionalism , that one is a speaker behind a speech act in virtue of having the relevant communicative illocutionary intention. An alternative view is presented called speaker responsibilism according to which one is a speaker in virtue of having certain responsibilities. Complexities are considered which arise from the kinds of responsibilities the speaker has and the specific ways in which they are acquired.
Source: Language & Communication
Author: Grace Paterson
Language: English
Subfield: Language and Linguistics
Field: Arts and Humanities
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $1,800
Awards: G2720731229, G5303902161
OpenAlex ID: W4243498433
