Work

When Two Isn’t Better Than One: Single Versus Multiple Angiographic Views for Quantitative Flow Ratio

Year: 2022

Type: editorial

Abstract: Assessing coronary physiology by measuring fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide percutaneous coronary intervention has been shown in multiple studies to improve clinical outcomes compared with using angiography alone.1,2 Despite the extensive data and clinical guidelines supporting the use of FFR, the adoption of coronary physiology guidance remains low.3 To address potential barriers to uptake, a number of angiography-based coronary physiology tools have been validated that compute FFR from angiographic images.

Source: Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions

DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100411

Authors: Sneha S. Jain, William F. Fearon

Institutions: Stanford Medicine, Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University

Language: English

Topic: Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics

Subfield: Surgery

Field: Medicine

Domain: Health Sciences

SDG: Good health and well-being

Open Access status: gold

Estimated APC paid: $2,400

OpenAlex ID: W4293795480

Cites: 9

Cited by:

Related to: 10