Work

Power and the confrontation of sexism: the impact of measured and manipulated power on confronting behavior

Year: 2022

Type: article

Abstract: The confrontation of prejudicial acts and comments promotes multiple benefits, most notably the prevention of future prejudicial remarks and the reduction of stereotype use. Research, however, consistently shows low rates of confronting prejudice, particularly regarding sexism. Here, we examine whether personal sense of power, known to increase action and activate the behavioral approach system, increases the likelihood of confronting a sexist remark. In Study 1, we demonstrate that for both women and men, self-reported power is associated with a higher frequency of confronting sexism. In Study 2, we manipulate women's sense of power (i.e., high power, low power, or control) and subsequently present an opportunity to confront a sexist remark. Results show that women primed to feel powerful were more likely to confront the sexist remark and expressed greater disagreement with the comment, compared to women primed to feel powerless. Implications for the confronting literature and behavior are discussed.

Source: The Journal of Social Psychology

DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2022.2122767

Authors: Nicholas P. Alt, Jenniffer Wong Chavez, Cheryl L. Dickter, Margaret J. Shih

Institutions: Occidental College, University of Kansas, William & Mary, University of California, Los Angeles

Language: English

Topic: Social and Intergroup Psychology

Subfield: Sociology and Political Science

Field: Social Sciences

Domain: Social Sciences

SDG: Gender equality

Open Access status: green

Funder: Air Force Office of Scientific Research