Work

Publisher Correction: Total and regional appendicular skeletal muscle mass prediction from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition models

Year: 2023

Type: erratum

Abstract: The original Figures 2 and 3 and accompanying legends appear below. Figure 2 Predicted total, arm, and leg skeletal muscle (SM) mass versus corresponding value measured with MRI in the validation sample (n = 47 women; 48 men) on the left ( A , C , E ) and associated Bland–Altman plots on the right ( B , D , F ). The regression equations, lines, R 2 s, and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) are shown in the figures. The statistical significance of each panel is summarized in the text. Full size image Figure 3 Total skeletal muscle (SM) mass predicted by Kim’s equation 8 versus SM measured with MRI at Kiel ( A ) and corresponding Bland–Altman plot ( B ) (n = 475). Total body skeletal muscle (SM) mass predicted by the newly developed Kiel equation versus SM measured with MRI by Kim et al. 8 ( C ) and corresponding Bland–Altman plot ( D ) (n = 270). The lines of identity (thin solid line), regression equations and lines (solid lines with gray shading indicating 95% CI), and R 2 s are shown in ( A , C ). The regression lines with 95% CI and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) (dashed lines) are shown in ( B , D ). Statistical significance of each panel is summarized in the text. Full size image

Source: Scientific Reports

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-39896-8