Work

Community members’ experiences training as medical journal reviewers

Year: 2023

Type: article

Abstract: PURPOSE: Although medical research dissemination is intended to benefit members of society, few members of society actually participate in the process of publishing findings. This study shares findings from community members' (including patients and the public) experiences being trained as medical journal reviewers. METHODS: We analyzed findings from two focus group interviews of community reviewers (N = 29) to identify themes in their experiences with the training program. RESULTS: Community members trained as journal reviewers appreciated learning the context under which manuscript development and review occur from authors and funders, the value of the community member perspectives to science, and strengthened their critical thinking skills. A range of training tools and strategies included glossaries of research terms, creating review guides, practicing reviews, being trained by a supportive team, and working with and learning collaboratively. CONCLUSIONS: Training as a journal reviewer has a positive impact on participating community members. Programs training community members as journal reviewers should incorporate guest speakers well-versed in community engaged research, group activities, a variety of training tools and materials, and highly supportive training teams.

Source: Research Involvement and Engagement

DOI: 10.1186/s40900-023-00482-x

Authors: Cyleste C. Collins, Erika Hood, Jeri Jewett-Tennant, Kurt Stange, Ashwini R. Sehgal

Institutions: Cleveland State University, Case Western Reserve University

Language: English

Topic: Mental Health and Patient Involvement

Subfield: General Health Professions

Field: Health Professions

Domain: Health Sciences

SDG: Quality education

Open Access status: gold

Estimated APC paid: $2,390