Year: 2023
Type: article
Abstract: An important aspect of the course of jurisprudence, which has a significant impact on the process of evaluation and correction of the construction of jurisprudence, built by scholars over time, is the so-called (Tracing), so it's an important part of the back-to-back process over the ages, aimed at completing the shortfall, or correcting the error that occurred, or deny any illusion, or restrict what is not permissible to release, Scientists and scholars were still rectifying each other, correcting each other.With the perfection of literature, knowledge of credit, preservation of stature, and distinguished scholars Takhi Din Muhammad bin Ali Al-Qashiri, Known as Ibn Dakeek Al-Eid, scientists witnessed him with abundant science, The quality of mind, which is careful consideration and reflection, and its intrusions and consequences are of high standing And this research came to study the jurisprudence of Ibn Dakeek Al-Eid on the Hanbali doctrine in water matters, In accordance with the curriculum, please consider the usefulness of studying these traces if God willing.One of the main aims of this research is: ١-to demonstrate the scientific status of Ibn Dakeek Al-Eid and to highlight the value of his jurisprudence's consequences on the Hanbali doctrine.٢-Highlight Ibn Dakeek Al-Eid curriculum in its implications for Hanbali doctrine and its features.٣.Collect the jurisprudence traces Ibn Dakeek Al-Eid jurisprudence on the Hanbali doctrine in matters of water, and study them according to a scientific curriculum, achieves the desired benefit of studying the traces with the approval of God Almighty.Evaluating and expressing opinions on those jurisprudence, together with explanation and guidance.One of the main findings of this research is: ١-the accuracy of the jurisprudence of Ibn Dakeek Al-Eid, and his interest in indicating the direction of tracing in the best way.٢-The issues of this research were eight, in which Ibn Dakeek Al-Eid meticulous followed the Hanbali doctrine in twelve places, The researcher agreed with him in seven places, and he agreed with his tracking of the Hanbali doctrine in three places, However, the researcher in those three locations had discussions, with which such tracing could be paid, The researcher disagreed with Ibn Dakeek Al-Eid on the Hanbali doctrine in two locations, where he explained the reason for this.One of the research's recommendations is: ١-to take care of the jurisprudence of scientists in general, - ) ٣٢٩٦ ( and of jurists in particular, as it identifies the calendar and corrective aspect of the history of science and classification.٢-Take care of the development of a precise scientific curriculum for the study of jurisprudence traces, ensuring the realization of the scientific and intellectual benefits hoped for in the study.٣-Paying attention to studying the jurisprudential corrections of the scholar Ibn Daqiq al-Eid, as he has many corrections on many issues for a number of jurists and schools of thought, due to the accuracy and depth of his words.
Author: أحمد بن فهد بن حميّن الفهد
Language: Arabic
Subfield: Education
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: bronze
OpenAlex ID: W4387622140
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: