Year: 2024
Type: article
Abstract: Palliative surgical procedures are operations that aim to alleviate symptoms in a patient with serious, life-limiting illness. They are common, particularly within the field of surgical oncology. However, few high-quality studies have attempted to measure the durability of improvements in symptoms and quality of life after palliative surgery. Furthermore, many of the studies that do exist are outdated and employ highly inconsistent definitions of palliative surgery. Consequently, the paucity of robust and reliable evidence on the benefits, risks, and trade-offs of palliative surgery hampers clinical decision-making for patients and their surgeons. The evidence for palliative surgery suggests that, with effective communication about goals of care and careful patient selection, palliative surgery can provide symptomatic relief and reduce healthcare burdens for certain seriously ill patients.
Source: British journal of surgery
DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae068
Authors: Elizabeth J Lilley, Orly N Farber, Zara Cooper
Language: English
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: bronze
Awards: G3169464246, G4399889580, Understanding and Improving Surgical Decision-Making for Persons Living with Dementia, their Family Caregivers, and their Providers: A Mixed Methods Study, Structural Racism and Engagement of Family Caregivers in Serious Illness Care, G7826140395, G8024259259, G8393614548, A Layered Examination of the Patient Experience to Elucidate the Role of Palliative Care in Surgical Care for Seriously Ill Older Adults, Mentored Research Training in Aging and Surgery (MERITAS), Research Training in Alimentary Tract Surgery
OpenAlex ID: W4392946589
