Additional file 15: of Comprehensive assessment of multiple biases in small RNA sequencing reveals significant differences in the performance of widely used methods
Year: 2019
Type: dataset
Abstract: Table S12. Pairwise comparisons of triplicate inconsistency error bewteen starting amounts. Statistics for t-tests of triplicate inconsistency error between different starting amounts for each tested method are shown. Percent difference is calculated as the percentage that the first amount in the comparison is relative to the second, thus Fivepercent 100 ng data had 13.84% more error than the 250 ng data. Percent difference was calculated using more precise means than the rounded means shown in the table. Significant findings are highlighted in yellow. Illumina did not show a significant difference in consistency between the tested starting amounts, (F = 1.44, p = 0.23). (XLSX 43 kb)
Source: Figshare
Language: English
Subfield: Molecular Biology
Domain: Life Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W4394099432