Additional file 8: of Comprehensive assessment of multiple biases in small RNA sequencing reveals significant differences in the performance of widely used methods
Year: 2019
Type: dataset
Abstract: Table S6. Clontech subsample analysis. The original number of reads was retained for all methods other than Clontech. The variation in the number of detected miRNAs (number of those with >â 10 normalized reads) for the other methods demonstrates the influence of the inclusion of the different Clontech subsets on the DESeq2 normalization. The normalization in this case only included these samples, therefore there may be differences compared to the other tables. (XLSX 34 kb)
Source: Figshare
Language: English
Subfield: Molecular Biology
Domain: Life Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W4394300593