Work

ISPOR health policy council proposed good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: Benefit or harm?

Year: 2024

Type: article

Abstract: There are increasing calls for better understanding of “what works” in health care. One of the means for assessing what works is through “comparative effectiveness research” (CER). Ideally, the needed data would come from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or from natural experiments. RCTs would need to be large, practical clinical trials that compare interventions head-to-head in real clinical settings, using novel approaches to assess clinically relevant outcomes.

Source: Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)

DOI: 10.17615/454m-c415

Authors: Carey, T., Stürmer, T., Poole, C.

Language: English

Topic: Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Subfield: Economics and Econometrics

Field: Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Domain: Social Sciences

SDG: Good health and well-being

Open Access status: green

OpenAlex ID: W4400024020

FWCI:

Cites:

Cited by:

Related to: 10