Work

Computational Models of High-Definition Electroconvulsive Therapy for Focal or Multitargeting Treatment

Year: 2024

Type: article

Abstract: ABSTRACT: Attempts to dissociate electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) therapeutic efficacy from cognitive side effects of ECT include modifying electrode placement, but traditional electrode placements employing 2 large electrodes are inherently nonfocal, limiting the ability to selectively engage targets associated with clinical benefit while avoiding nontargets associated with adverse side effects. Limited focality represents a technical limitation of conventional ECT, and there is growing evidence that the spatial distribution of the ECT electric fields induced in the brain drives efficacy and side effects. Computational models can be used to predict brain current flow patterns for existing and novel ECT montages. Using finite element method simulations (under quasi-static, nonadaptive assumptions, 800-mA total current), the electric fields generated in the superficial cortex and subcortical structures were predicted for the following traditional ECT montages (bilateral temporal, bifrontal, right unilateral) and experimental montages (focal electrically administered seizure therapy, lateralized high-definition [HD]-ECT, unilateral 4 × 1-ring HD-ECT, bilateral 4 × 1-ring HD-ECT, and a multipolar HD-ECT). Peak brain current density in regions of interest was quantified. Conventional montages (bilateral bifrontal, right unilateral) each produce distinct but diffuse and deep current flow. Focal electrically administered seizure therapy and lateralized HD-ECT produce unique, lateralized current flow, also impacting specific deep regions. A 4 × 1-ring HD-ECT restricts current flow to 1 (unilateral) or 2 (bilateral) cortical regions. Multipolar HD-ECT shows optimization to a specific target set. Future clinical trials are needed to determine whether enhanced control over current distribution is achieved with these experimental montages, and the resultant seizures, improve the risk/benefit ratio of ECT.

Source: Journal of Ect

DOI: 10.1097/yct.0000000000001069

Authors: Niranjan Khadka, Zhi-De Deng, Sarah H. Lisanby, Marom Bikson, Joan A. Camprodon