Work

Modification of polyethylene for oil-water separation in industrial wastewater treatment

Year: 2024

Type: article

Abstract: Low-density polyethylene (LDPE) is extensively used worldwide in various applications due to its versatile features and abundant commercial availability. This study investigated, for the first time, the beneficial use of a novel chemically modified commercial-grade LDPE as a sorbent for oil-water separation in industrial wastewater treatment. Several laboratory tests were conducted in batch and continuous fixed-bed modes to evaluate the LDPE adsorbent’s capacity, performance repeatability and recyclability under relevant field conditions. These results were compared to walnut shell (WS), a widely used sorbent for removing oil from industrial wastewaters, including produced water from oil and gas operations. Untreated LDPE achieved higher total organic carbon (TOC) removals and retention capacities, ∼20 % and ∼66 mg/g, respectively, when compared to untreated WS, <5 % and <1 mg/g, respectively. Improved kinetics and adsorption behavior favorability were achieved for LDPE after chemical modification using a cationic monomer. Both the chemically treated LDPE and WS showed comparable TOC removal rates (ranging from 60 % to 80 %). However, the modified LDPE exhibited higher sorption capacities (∼61 mg/g) compared to the treated WS (8.0 mg/g). Chemical regeneration of LDPE with toluene demonstrated superior performance recovery (>90 %) when compared to physical cleaning with deionized water (<40 %). The study presented promising results in advancing novel materials like LDPE to support circular economy in industrial wastewater treatment. • Low density polyethylene (LDPE) surface was modified for industrial water treatment. • LDPE performance was compared to commercial walnut shell (WS) media. • Oil removal efficiency of LDPE was enhanced after modification (from 20 % to 60 %). • LDPE showed higher sorption capacity than WS media (∼8.0 vs ∼61 mg/g). • Chemical regeneration of LDPE was more effective than physical cleaning.

Source: Journal of environmental chemical engineering

DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2024.114067