Work

Commonalities and differences in strategies for regulating motivation and emotion in academic settings: A within-person approach

Year: 2024

Type: article

Abstract: Background: Motivation and emotion form important pillars of students’ educational experiences and, while representing distinguishable constructs, are closely intertwined. Consequently, it can be assumed that their regulation may be governed by similar mechanisms as well. From a theoretical perspective, MR and ER strategy taxonomies do contain overlap, particularly among strategies involving reappraisals of personal competencies, but also unique (i.e., non-overlapping) strategies. Empirically, however, motivational regulation (MR) and emotion regulation (ER) have had little intersection in prior research and stem from rather disconnected research traditions.Aims: Building on previous work on the functional interplay between students’ motivation and emotion, we examined similarities and differences in MR and ER strategies and tested the assumption that MR strategies are also used to regulate emotions, and ER strategies to regulate motivation, in study situations. Sample: Participants were 1,466 university students.Method: Using a within-person design, students reported on their use of various strategies for managing regulatory problems involving either low motivation or negative emotions.Results: Using CFA and latent difference modeling, we found that strategy use was strongly correlated and differed little in terms of mean levels across motivational and emotional regulation problems. These correlations and mean differences were even stronger respectively smaller than those found for regulatory problem distinctions within motivational and emotional problems. Conclusions: The findings indicate that many designated MR and ER strategies as distinguished in current taxonomies may be relevant for managing both motivational and emotional problems and underscore the need for joint theoretical perspectives on MR and ER.

Source: Learning and Instruction

DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102009

Authors: Kristina Stockinger, Ulrike E. Nett, Markus Dresel

Institution: University of Augsburg

Language: English

Topic: Education, Achievement, and Giftedness

Subfield: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Field: Psychology

Domain: Social Sciences

SDG: Quality education

Open Access status: hybrid

Estimated APC paid: $4,450