Work

Internal forces measured in segmental tunnel linings compared with numerical predictions obtained from state-of-the-art calculation methods used in engineering practice

Year: 2024

Type: article

Abstract: • Analytical methods and numerical models can determine accurately inner forces in segmental lining. • A comparison is useful between calculation results and in situ monitoring. • Assembly imperfections influence the development of bending moments in segmental linings. • Some common modeling approaches might underestimate the stresses in tunnel linings. • The whole possible parameter bandwidth should be investigated in structural design. Different calculation methods and modeling strategies are commonly used in engineering practice to predict the internal forces in segmental tunnel linings. Accordingly, the calculation results can differ. The present paper compares internal forces resulting from five state-of-the-art calculation models, of which three continuum models and two bedded beam models, to new in-situ measurements of internal forces at the recently built TBM tunnel for the U5 metro line in Frankfurt, Germany, and discusses agreements and differences. Hereby, a generally good agreement is found for the normal forces. The predictions of the bending moments are satisfying, but there are some discrepancies. It is shown that it might be necessary to consider assembly imperfections in the calculation models to improve the agreement between the calculation results and the measurements. Also, the differences between the calculation methods themselves are addressed. It is analyzed that generally continuum models give more realistic internal forces, but that also bedded beam models can have advantages, e.g. when large parametric studies are required. Finally, recommendations are given regarding the application of calculation models for structural design.

Source: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology

DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2024.106084

Authors: Fabian Rauch, Pierpaolo Oreste, Oliver Fischer

Institutions: Technical University of Munich, Politecnico di Torino

Language: English

Topic: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures

Subfield: Civil and Structural Engineering

Field: Engineering

Domain: Physical Sciences

SDG: Industry, innovation and infrastructure

Open Access status: hybrid

Estimated APC paid: $3,560