A feasibility trial of olanzapine for young people with Anorexia Nervosa (OPEN): clinicians’ perspectives
Year: 2024
Type: article
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The OPEN feasibility trial testing olanzapine in anorexia nervosa (AN) in young people (YP) was not successful due to poor recruitment. This study aims to understand clinicians' views and experiences of using olanzapine in AN and the challenges in implementing the trial in National Health Service (NHS) clinical settings. METHODS: We conducted qualitative interviews with eating disorders (ED) clinicians involved with the study (n = 11). Framework analysis was applied to qualitative data to identify barriers and facilitators to recruitment and study implementation. A web-based semi-structured Qualtrics survey was administered to ED clinicians (n = 24). Findings from the survey were used to corroborate and expand on the information derived from qualitative interviews. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis identified four main themes: (1) Acknowledging Service User (SU) / Family Concerns, (2) Prioritising person-centred care, (3) Limited Service Capacity and (4) Study eligibility criteria. Subthemes are outlined accordingly. Clinicians appeared confident addressing SU concerns around olanzapine in clinical discussions, but timing was critical, and olanzapine was considered one aspect of treatment that needed to align with their holistic approach. Service pressures restricted opportunities for recruitment and the ability to offer regular review. At the same time, some YP were ineligible for the trial, as they were already taking olanzapine, or needed to be prescribed it more promptly than the study procedures allowed. Survey findings underlined confidence in prescribing and informing on olanzapine, the various possible benefits of olanzapine besides weight gain, and the importance of therapeutic alliances and informed consent. Both data sets highlight the need for further evidence on long-term safety, side effects and efficacy of olanzapine use for AN. Where clinical service capacity is at a premium, research implementation is not prioritised, particularly in intensive clinical settings. CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide first-hand insight into individual and systemic challenges with research implementation in the NHS, which need to be considered when designing future clinical research studies. We emphasise a person-centred approach when discussing olanzapine to consider a holistic recovery from AN beyond weight-gain as an isolated outcome for improvement.
Source: Journal of Eating Disorders
Language: English
Subfield: Clinical Psychology
Field: Psychology
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $2,090
Funders: South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, King's College London, NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, Arts and Humanities Research Council, Medical Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council
Awards: Olanzapine for young PEople with aNorexia nervosa: An open-label feasibility study to test recruitment, treatment acceptance, adherence, safety, outcome measures and patients' experience to prepare for a randomised placebo-controlled trial (OPEN), G291674040, Eating Disorders: Delineating illness and recovery trajectories to inform personalised prevention and early intervention in young people (EDIFY), G8262056361, G8533677071
OpenAlex ID: W4402926868
