Laughing All the Way To the Bench: The Role of Humor in Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings
Year: 2024
Type: article
Abstract: Supreme Court confirmation hearings serve a unique role in our government: they are the only instances where future Justices and their judicial philosophies are televised and subject to the scrutiny of not only the Senate, but also the public. Especially as judicial nominations become increasingly politicized and polarized, appearing trustworthy, likeable, and sensible becomes essential to nominees’ candidacy. Humor thus arms judges with the ability to volunteer positive information, appear humble, showcase values, lighten difficult topics and otherwise bond with Senators. Perhaps more saliently, it enables them to dodge, correct, or mock contentious or unflattering lines of questioning. By studying when, why, and how nominees use humor, we can get a glimpse into their future jurisprudence and decisions on the Bench: avoiding a topic or making light of a question may seem harmless in the hearing, but can actually reveal a nominee’s position on an issue and serve an important truth-telling role.
Author: Joanna T. Brown
Institution: Tufts University
Language: English
Subfield: Law
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
OpenAlex ID: W4402941587