Effectiveness and safety of azvudine versus nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in adult patients infected with COVID-19 omicron strains: a retrospective study in Beijing
Year: 2024
Type: article
Study design: Observational Study
Abstract: The study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of azvudine versus nirmatrelvir-ritonavir against omicron strains of coronavirus disease 2019 infections and determine their comparative effectiveness. This retrospective study included 716 patients who received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NR group) or azvudine (FNC group) at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between 1 November 2022 and 27 February 2023. Patients in the FNC group (n = 304) were younger, exhibited less severe symptoms, started antiviral therapy later, received corticosteroids more frequently, and used tocilizumab less frequently than patients in the NR group (n = 412). Within 28 d of therapy, 40 (9.7%) and 20 (6.6%) deaths were in the NR and FNC groups, respectively. No differences were observed between drugs and mortality rates (odds ratio [OR] 0.78, 95% CI 0.40-1.5, P = 0.45), clinical improvement (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.79-1.3, P = 0.38), and clinical progression (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.58-1.8, P = 0.96). More patients in the NR group experienced platelet decline than those in the FNC group (17.6% vs. 8.9%, P = 0.034). This study indicated that the effectiveness and safety of azvudine were comparable to those of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir.
Source: Scientific Reports
Authors: Huaiya Xie, Yaqi Wang, Yan Xu, Luo Wang, Junping Fan, Siqi Pan, Chuan Shi, Xiaoyan Liu, Xiaoxing Gao, Xiaobei Guo, Siyuan Yu, Jia Liu, Dongming Zhang, Yanli Yang, Hong Zhang, Jinglan Wang, Aohua Wu, Xueqi Liu, Jihai Liu, Huadong Zhu, Xiang Zhou, Xinlun Tian, Mengzhao Wang
Language: English
Subfield: Infectious Diseases
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $2,590
Awards: G1644550327, G6865468331
OpenAlex ID: W4403376500
