Work

Formal models and justifications of democracy

Year: 2024

Type: article

Abstract: Recently, some epistemic democrats have taken a result from Hong and Page (Proc Natl Acad Sci 101(46):16385–16389, 2004) to help justify the virtues of deliberative democracy. In this paper, I present novel computational models and show that the result fails to be robust in ways that undermine it as evidence for justifying the virtues of deliberative democracy. In particular, the same model lauded by epistemic deliberative democrats can also be used to support certain kinds of epistocracy.

Source: Synthese

DOI: 10.1007/s11229-024-04783-w

Author: Benjamin Santos Genta

Institution: University of California, Irvine

Language: English

Topic: Political Theory and Democracy

Subfield: Political Science and International Relations

Field: Social Sciences

Domain: Social Sciences

SDG: Peace, justice, and strong institutions

Open Access status: hybrid

Estimated APC paid: $2,990