Forest deliberations: Marteloscopes as sites of encounter between climate activists and forest managers
Year: 2024
Type: article
Abstract: In recent years, climate change and societal changes have increased the complexity of demands on multifunctional forest management, leading to new lines of conflict. Consequently, public forest management in particular seeks to improve communication and interaction with societal groups with which they previously have not been familiar. In our study, we apply the deliberative model of democracy to assess the suitability of silvicultural training sites (“marteloscopes”) for fostering deliberative communication on multifunctional forest management between foresters and young climate activists. Furthermore, we examine the interpretative frames emerging in this context. We adopt an exploratory study design, using participant observation and group discussions, which we analyze with sequential reconstructive methods. We find that marteloscope exercises generally support dialogue that meets the criteria of deliberate communication. We also observe a noticeable knowledge hierarchy, which presents a potential barrier to open deliberative processes. We identify three main interpretative frames brought by participants that in part challenge dominant forest frames: (1) forests as complex ecosystems (2) composed of living beings, and (3) sustainability as sufficiency, focused on timber consumption and the role of global market dynamics. Reflecting and acknowledging them could provide opportunities for improving communication between foresters and non-experts in times of climate change and other major transformations. Additionally, we encourage the use of settings conducive for informal, face-to-face deliberation to elicit and include perspectives that may not otherwise be represented in traditional governance structures. • We study deliberative communication between foresters and climate activists. • Marteloscope exercises foster dialogue and expression of diverse perspectives. • Forests' role for climate mitigation was not a significant concern for participants. • Participants bring three main interpretive frames on forests and sustainability. • We recommend informal deliberation to elicit diverse frames and create mutual trust.
Source: Forest Policy and Economics
Authors: Manuel John, Kristina Wirth, Anna Kaufmann, Hannah Ertelt, Theresa Frei
Language: English
Topic: Forest Management and Policy
Subfield: Global and Planetary Change
Field: Environmental Science
Domain: Physical Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $3,830
OpenAlex ID: W4403515915