Recommendations for reviewing manuscripts of the article types “project report” and “how to” for the GMS Journal for Medical Education
Year: 2024
Type: article
Abstract: Objective: in the GMS Journal for Medical Education, as well as outlining the development of these criteria. Methods: In a workshop with writers, reviewers, and editors, we formulated and discussed common core elements for articles. We did this by consulting the journal's editorial board on the basis of guidelines for authors and reviewers from other journals and by using examples of articles considered less or more successful. From this, we derived specific aspects to be addressed and rejection criteria for the respective article types. Results: We have identified the target group, relevance, justification, and implication as the common core elements for both article types. We have also derived specific aspects to be addressed and rejection criteria from these core elements for each article type. Conclusion: A manuscript lacking core elements will be rejected. If aspects are not described sufficiently or are not clearly comprehensible, the manuscript must be revised.
Source: PubMed
DOI: 10.3205/zma001691
Authors: Schüttpelz-Brauns, Katrin, Homberg, Angelika, Giesler, Marianne, Schneider, Achim, Gadewoltz, Pia, Boeker, Martin, Möltner, Andreas, Matthes, Jan
Language: English
Subfield: History and Philosophy of Science
Field: Arts and Humanities
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W4403516157