Year: 2024
Type: conference-paper
Abstract: We propose two soft notions of the notion of admissibility in abstract argumentation. The first one weakens the defence notion by allowing, to a certain degree, undefended attacks, and the second one allows, to a certain degree, conflicts within sets of arguments. We analyse these new semantical notions based on the computational complexity of optimisation and approximation. Finally, we discuss and analyse soft notions for preferred semantics.
DOI: 10.24963/kr.2024/63
Authors: Kenneth Skiba, Matthias Thimm
Institution: FernUniversität in Hagen
Language: English
Subfield: Artificial Intelligence
Field: Computer Science
Domain: Physical Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Funder: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
OpenAlex ID: W4403792783
