Case report: Single gene testing and comprehensive genomic profiling in non-small cell lung cancer—a case series of divergent results from a large reference laboratory
Year: 2024
Type: article
Study design: Case Report
Abstract: Clinical management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) requires accurate identification of tumor-specific genetic alterations to inform treatment options. Historically, providers have relied on single-gene testing (SGT) for actionable variants due to a perception of cost-effectiveness and/or efficient turnaround time compared to next-generation sequencing (NGS). However, not all actionable variants may be evaluated through SGT modalities, and an SGT approach can exhaust valuable tissue needed for more comprehensive analyses. In contrast, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests employ NGS to sequence megabases of DNA and RNA to evaluate all relevant molecular alterations, providing a broader genetic profile to identify actionable alterations that SGT may not accurately or efficiently assess. Here, we briefly describe four cases from a large reference laboratory in which actionable alterations were identified by CGP but not SGT. The discussion highlights the utility and advantages of using CGP to provide complete and timely treatment options and clinical trial opportunities for patients with NSCLC.
Source: Frontiers in Oncology
Institutions: LabCorp (United States), Duke Medical Center, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Baptist Health System, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Wake Forest University
Language: English
Subfield: Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $3,295
OpenAlex ID: W4403959669
