Work

Format Matters: Comparing the Inclusiveness and Effectiveness of Hybrid and Remote Meetings

Year: 2024

Type: article

Abstract: The surge in remote and hybrid work has provided many benefits in terms of flexibility and autonomy, but it also presents challenges when it comes to team collaboration and meetings. Using a mixed-methods field study, we compare hybrid and remote meeting configurations to better understand how to improve the inclusiveness and effectiveness of these different meeting modalities. Our findings indicate that overall, fully-remote meetings are the most inclusive and effective. Fully-remote meetings are perceived as more inclusive of remote attendees despite their lower chat usage compared to hybrid meetings. We also find that people's preferred format varies depending on the purpose or type of meeting and the skill set of the meeting moderator. We provide recommendations for improving meeting inclusion and effectiveness in both hybrid and remote meetings, such as training moderators and integrating chats with the main meeting.

Source: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

DOI: 10.1145/3686968

Authors: Matin Yarmand, Liana Kreamer, Siddharth Suri, Sonia Jaffe

Institutions: University of California San Diego, Florida Institute of Technology, Microsoft (United States)

Language: English

Topic: Team Dynamics and Performance

Subfield: Social Psychology

Field: Psychology

Domain: Social Sciences

Open Access status: hybrid

OpenAlex ID: W4404171578

FWCI: 1.879

Cites: 33

Cited by: 4

Related to: 10