Work

OGC SO03 - Impact of recent European consensus guidelines on Oligometastic Disease (OMD) and potential case load of Oesophagogastric cancer resections

Year: 2024

Type: article

Abstract: Background To evaluate the impact of recently devised oligometastatic disease (OMD) criteria as per the European consensus guidelines on the eligibility of Oesophagogastric (OG) cancer patients for curative treatment. Method A retrospective analysis was conducted on OG cancer cases discussed at multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings at a tertiary university hospital from January 2018 to December 2023. Inclusion criteria included T2-T4a adenocarcinomas, T2-T4b squamous cell carcinomas, small cell carcinoma and adeno-squamous carcinomas that were classified as M1 disease. Exclusion criteria were T4b adenocarcinomas, M1 peritoneal disease, non-adeno/ squamous carcinoma histology, M1 peritoneal cytology, and head and neck squamous cell carcinomas proximal to the thoracic inlet. Data on patient demographics, T stage, histology, and metastatic sites were analysed to identify those meeting the oligometastatic disease criteria. Results 483 of 696 were diagnosed as M1 disease. OMD was found in 59 cases (12.2%), with a median age of 72 years (43 males, 16 females). T stage distribution: 3 T2, 36 T3, 20 T4. Histology: 39 adenocarcinomas, 19 squamous cell carcinomas, 1 small cell carcinoma. Metastatic sites: non-regional lymph nodes (77.9%), liver (13.6%), lung (5.1%), bone (1.7%), adrenal (1.7%) Location of Lymph Node Involvement: 1Para-aortic11 (23.9%)2Right supra-clavicular7 (15.2%)3Porto-caval6 (13.0%)4Retro-crural5 (10.9%)5Upper mediastinal5 (10.9%)6Left Supraclavicular5 (10.9%)7Coeliac4 (8.6%)8SMA3 (6.6%) Conclusion Our data would suggest that 12.2% of patients discussed in the MDT may potentially be candidates for a curative intent treatment pathway. Although the long-term outcomes remain unclear, this approach may define a subgroup of patients who may benefit from curative intent treatment with the highest site being para-aortic nodes.

Source: British journal of surgery

DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae271.128