Beyond nomothetics and idiographics: Towards a systematization of personality research approaches
Year: 2024
Type: article
Abstract: Psychology is concerned with both general laws of psychological functioning and with the individual person. The debate surrounding nomothetics and idiographics has been brought up repeatedly, but it has never been completely resolved. We therefore aim to provide conceptual clarity on how the terms “idiographic” and “nomothetic” are used and how conflating these with other concepts negatively impacts research. By differentiating distinct inferential goals and research approaches, we disentangle these confounding concepts. We demonstrate that the nomothetic-idiographic distinction alone is insufficient for categorizing research approaches in personality science. Specifically, we present a categorization of research approaches based on (a) the focal entity (person(s) vs. population(s)) and (b) the type of generalization (no vs. entity-specific vs. cross-entity) resulting in a 2×3 matrix of research approaches. Finally, we propose a framework of 25 polytomous criteria to extend upon these two distinctions. This framework can be mapped onto the generic empirical research process and may help researchers to make decisions in the research process more explicit.
Source: European Journal of Personality
Authors: Le Vy Phan, Nick Modersitzki, Niclas Kuper, Nadin Beckmann, Malgosia Fajkowska, Mario Gollwitzer, Kai T Horstmann, Markus Quirin, Karl-Heinz Renner, Aidan G Wright, John F Rauthmann
Institutions: Universität der Bundeswehr München, University of Münster, Durham University, Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, University of Siegen, PFH Private University of Applied Sciences, Technical University of Munich, University of Michigan
Language: English
Subfield: Clinical Psychology
Field: Psychology
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $3,700
OpenAlex ID: W4404582441
