Year: 2024
Type: article
Abstract: Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate the discursive frameworks and identify the key actors who advocate for viewing water solely as a resource and commodity, with the aim of examining the contrasting discourses surrounding water as a human right and a common natural good. Theoretical Framework: The research is underpinned by historical and dialectical methods within a qualitative and interdisciplinary approach. It builds on theories of power-knowledge dynamics and the commodification of natural resources, particularly water, as explored in the works of Barlow and Clarke (2003), and Espinoza and Martins (2021). Method: The methodology adopted for this research comprises a qualitative study design, utilizing historical and dialectical methods to analyze international norms and official documents from the ten World Water Forums. Data collection was carried out through the examination of reports, declarations, and resolutions, focusing on the discourse and governance models related to water. Results and Discussion: The results revealed a contradictory stance within the forums: while promoting privatization through public-private partnerships, a global trend toward remunicipalization of water services emerged as a response to social and distributive inequalities. The analysis highlights the dominance of economic interests in water management discourse and the marginalization of alternative perspectives. Research Implications: The findings provide insights into the implications of water governance models, particularly how they influence policies on sustainability and water security. This research sheds light on the dynamics of power and resistance within global water governance frameworks, impacting public policy and international legislation. Originality/Value: This study contributes to the literature by critically examining the commodification of water through a lens of power-knowledge dynamics and its implications for global governance. Its originality lies in the comparative analysis of documents from the World Water Forums and the critique of dominant neoliberal approaches, offering a foundation for rethinking sustainable and equitable water management practices.
Institutions: Universidade Estadual de Goiás, Eduardo Mondlane University
Language: English
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
OpenAlex ID: W4405313747