Year: 2024
Type: article
Abstract: Freedom of expression, the right to articulate one's thoughts and ideas, stands as a cornerstone of human rights, enabling individuals to voice their opinions without fear of retribution. However, this fundamental freedom is often subject to constraints due to concerns over the potential for hate speech, the spread of misinformation, and the need to safeguard national security. This paper delves into the contrasting approaches taken by China and the United Kingdom in balancing the protection of free speech with the imposition of necessary restrictions. In China, the government prioritizes national security and social stability, which results in a more stringent regulatory framework governing the discourse of its citizens. The United Kingdom upholds the principle of free speech through its Human Rights Act, which enshrines the right to freedom of expression as a fundamental right. However, even within this framework, there are limits to what can be said, particularly in instances where speech could incite hatred or violence. By comparing these two distinct models, this paper seeks to illustrate the complexities surrounding the issue of free speech. It highlights how different societies grapple with the challenge of fostering an environment where open dialogue can flourish while also protecting against its potential abuses. The comparison aims to shed light on the delicate balance that must be struck between upholding the right to express oneself and ensuring the safety and well-being of society at large.
DOI: 10.54097/ad7ett19
Author: Enrui Zhang
Language: English
Topic: Law, Rights, and Freedoms
Subfield: Sociology and Political Science
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: diamond
OpenAlex ID: W4405354337