Work

La inviabilidad del voto popular para elegir ministros, magistrados y jueces en México

Year: 2024

Type: article

Abstract: Objective: Exploring the viability of electing ministers, magistrates, and judges by popular vote in Mexico and highlight its risks, such as the lack of transparency and objectivity. Methodology: Qualitative, involving document analysis to examine the proposed reform and its implications on the separation of powers and human rights protection. Results: Suggest that popular elections compromise the impartiality of the judicial system. Value: An alternative selection method is proposed, based on performance evaluation and professional trajectory, promoting indirect citizen participation. Limitations: There is need for further research on the electorate’s perceptions. Conclusions: This study emphasizes the importance of maintaining the integrity and independence of The Judiciary in Mexico.

Source: región y sociedad

DOI: 10.22198/rys2024/36/1917

Authors: Gabriela Ruiz de la Torre, David Xicoténcatl Rueda López

Institutions: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, National Pedagogic University, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo

Language: English

Topic: Judicial and Constitutional Studies

Subfield: Law

Field: Social Sciences

Domain: Social Sciences

SDG: Peace, justice, and strong institutions

Open Access status: diamond

OpenAlex ID: W4405583082

FWCI: 2.652

Cites:

Cited by: 1

Related to: 10