Year: 2024
Type: article
Study design: Observational Study
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Candida auris can cause nosocomial outbreaks and provides challenges concerning diagnosis, treatment, eradication and infection prevention. There are no Dutch standards or guidelines for C. auris, and current hospital practices are unknown. Therefore, we assessed whether Dutch hospitals are prepared for C. auris introduction. METHODS: An online questionnaire concerning screening, diagnostics, infection prevention and outbreaks was distributed amongst medical microbiologists and infection prevention practitioners in spring 2024. FINDINGS: Fifty-two questionnaires were processed comprising 58 hospitals. Most participants (60%) did not screen for C. auris carriership and 51% did not have a protocol describing screening procedures. Healthcare workers were rarely screened. Screening sites and number of swabs varied. All respondents would place a patient with C. auris in isolation, 71% had a protocol describing isolation measures. Most hospitals took extra cleaning precautions after finding C. auris. None of the hospitals ever had a C. auris-outbreak, 29% had an outbreak protocol. Procedures to cease isolation were present in 31%, but 10% never declare a patient C. auris-free. A diagnostic protocol (available in 53%) was primarily based on culture, but the execution differed. Molecular diagnostics were rarely used (12%). The majority did not screen nor did they have a protocol describing multi-drug-resistant candida outbreak coordination. CONCLUSIONS: Screening, diagnostics, infection prevention, control and outbreak management of C. auris vary amongst Dutch hospitals, and most are not fully prepared for C. auris. As inadequate preparation for C. auris is an international concern, guidance documents could aid in fulfilling this need.
Source: Journal of Hospital Infection
Language: English
Subfield: Infectious Diseases
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $3,540
OpenAlex ID: W4405586991