How to Foster Challenging Interdisciplinary Collaborations: Can Philosophy Support Neuroscientists?
Year: 2026
Type: review
Abstract: New conceptual and technological developments bring neuroscientists closer to other disciplines and other fields in neuroscience with different traditions. Although some neuroscientists may underrate the potential benefits of successful interdisciplinary collaborations, others may be unaware of the typical difficulties of such collaborations or are not trained in skills that render them fruitful. Here, we argue that interdisciplinary interactions have long been part of neuroscience, although they are often challenging, because neuroscientists may be confronted with concepts, assumptions, and interpretative horizons that differ from their own. This can lead to misunderstandings and little mutual appreciation. Using the historical development of brain imaging techniques, we distinguish between different types of interdisciplinary interactions and illustrate some of their benefits. In addition, we present various challenges for collaborations at the interface between traditional laboratory-type approaches and those of clinical or computational neuroscience or of ecological field approaches. To address these challenges, we invite neuroscientists to consider philosophers as collaboration partners with complementary expertise, which includes special consideration of language use, underlying assumptions and proficiency in conceptual analysis. This expertise can be used by neuroscientists to increase their understanding and address some difficulties in interdisciplinary interactions more effectively. The benefits of these interactions can be expected to outweigh challenges in the dialogue with philosophers. Importantly, neuroscientists can choose between reading philosophical literature, participating in joint events with philosophers, and integrating philosophers into neuroscience projects. This may allow neuroscientists to explore unforeseen possibilities to improve or initiate collaborations with scientists from other fields and disciplines.
Source: European Journal of Neuroscience
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.70542
Authors: M. Kunze, C. Brun, J. Badaut, M. Darnaudéry, F. Gross, L. Peltier, T. Pradeu, I. Sarto‐Jackson, J. P. Konsman
Institutions: Medical University of Vienna, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Bordeaux, Université Bordeaux Montaigne, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, Centre de Résonance Magnétique des Systèmes Biologiques, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement, NutriNeuro, Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux, Immunology from Concept and Experiments to Translation, Institut Interdisciplinaire de Neuroscience, Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research
Language: English
Subfield: History and Philosophy of Science
Field: Arts and Humanities
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $3,560
OpenAlex ID: W4405602718