Year: 2024
Type: article
Abstract: Curriculum evaluation models play a pivotal role in assessing the quality and effectiveness of educational programs. This study conducts a comparative analysis of the application and effectiveness of three key curriculum evaluation models—the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) model, quantitative evaluation methods, and educational system evaluations—in ASEAN countries. While the CIPP model is widely utilized, limited research exists on its contextual adaptation across different educational systems. Similarly, the integration of quantitative methods and system-wide evaluations often lacks coherence, resulting in incomplete assessments. By examining the strengths and weaknesses of these models, this research identifies best practices and areas for improvement. The findings provide actionable recommendations to enhance curriculum evaluation practices in the ASEAN region, contributing to the development of more effective and contextually relevant evaluation strategies that support the achievement of educational goals.
Language: English
Field: Decision Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
SDG: Quality education
Open Access status: hybrid
OpenAlex ID: W4405635406