Year: 2024
Type: article
Abstract: The article dicusses the theologico-political relationship in modern liberal democracies. The author contrasts two approaches to understanding the relationship between religion and politics: political religion, which strives for complete coincidence of religious and political spheres, and the theology of the political, based on the principle of their de-coincidence. Exploring the historical evolution of these relations from Antiquity through medieval Christianity to modernity, the author demonstrates how Christianity first introduced the principle of de-coincidence between theological and political dimensions, which was subsequently lost in the modern era. Special attention is paid to analyzing the works of modern philosophers (Hobbes, Spinoza, Locke, Rousseau) who laid the foundations for the contemporary understanding of relations between religion and politics. The central thesis of the article is that modern liberal democracies suffer from the absence of a legitimate form of relationship between religious and political dimensions. The author proposes the concept of “theology of the political,” based on the principle of de-coincidence, as a way to overcome this crisis. This approach allows avoiding both complete separation of religious and political spheres and their merger in the form of civil religion. The article argues that the legitimacy of theological discourse in the public sphere should be based not on the external authority of religious dogma, but on theology’s ability to create space for critical reflection on political order and social norms. This is particularly important in the context of contemporary challenges such as the migration crisis, bioethical debates, multiculturalism, and religious pluralism. The author concludes that overcoming the current crisis of liberal democracies requires revisiting both the principles of modernity and the role of religion in the public sphere. The author concludes that genuine autonomy of the political subject paradoxically requires recognition of its fundamental non-autonomy, which constitutes the essence of the democratic paradox most fully expressed in the Christian tradition.
Author: Bernard Bourdin
Institution: Institut catholique de paris
Language: English
Subfield: Sociology and Political Science
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
OpenAlex ID: W4405768725