Year: 2024
Type: article
Abstract: As global cities rapidly evolve, conventional approaches to architectural heritage conservation struggle to address the complexities of contemporary urban landscapes. This paper critically examines the limitations of the Venice Charter's monument-centric principles in recognizing the cultural significance of vernacular architecture, ephemeral spaces, and community narratives that shape the lived experiences of Tokyo's residents. Grounded in critical heritage theory and ethnographic research, it proposes an alternative set of principles that acknowledge the inherent value of the mundane, the utilitarian, and the ephemeral aspects of the built environment. Case studies, including the Yanesen neighborhood's grassroots preservation efforts and Studio Gross's PARK-PLATZ placemaking intervention, illustrate the principles in action. While acknowledging the Venice Charter's historical relevance for exceptional monuments, the paper calls for an expanded, community-centric paradigm that resonates with Tokyo's ever-evolving urban fabric. By advocating for inclusive frameworks that value the dynamic interplay between residents and their surroundings, this study offers a nuanced critique of traditional top-down conservation models. It highlights the urgency of developing responsive strategies that honour the multivalent realities and lived heritage embodied in the intricate tapestries of contemporary cities.
Source: Protection of cultural heritage
DOI: 10.35784/odk.6019
Author: Tamas Solymosi
Institution: University of Tsukuba
Language: English
Subfield: Archeology
Field: Arts and Humanities
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: diamond
OpenAlex ID: W4406217496