Mammography Home Workstations and Remote Diagnostic Breast Imaging: Current Practice Patterns and Planned Future Directions
Year: 2025
Type: article
Study design: Observational Study
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Assess current practices and plans regarding home workstations and remote diagnostic breast imaging in the United States. METHODS: A 43-question survey relating to remote breast imaging was distributed to Society of Breast Imaging members from July 6, 2023, through August 2, 2023. A descriptive summary of responses was performed. Pearson's chi-squared test was used to compare demographic variables of respondents and questions of interest. RESULTS: In total, 424 surveys were completed (response rate 13%, 424/3244). One-third of breast imaging radiologists (31%, 132/424) reported reading examinations from home or a personal remote site for a median of 25% of their clinical time. The most common types of examinations read from home were screening mammography (90%, 119/132), screening US (58%, 77/132), diagnostic mammography and MRI (both 53%, 70/132), and diagnostic US (49%, 65/132). Respondents from private practices were more likely than those from academic practices to read diagnostic imaging from home (67%, 35/52 vs 29%, 15/52; P <.001). Respondents practicing in the West were less likely to read breast imaging examinations from home compared with those in other geographic regions (18%, 12/67 vs 28%-43% for other regions; P = .023). No differences were found among respondents' overall use of home workstations based on age, gender, or having dependents. Most respondents (75%, 318/424) felt that remote breast reading would be a significant practice pattern in the future. CONCLUSION: Home workstations for mammography and remote diagnostic breast imaging are a considerable U.S. practice pattern. Further research should explore radiologist preferences regarding remote breast imaging and its impact on clinical care and radiologist well-being.
Source: Journal of Breast Imaging
DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbae087
Institutions: University of California, Los Angeles, Columbia University, Duke Medical Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, University of Washington, Weill Cornell Medical Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, New York University, Allina Health, New Ulm Medical Center, Johns Hopkins University, Johns Hopkins Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Language: English
Subfield: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: green
Awards: G111615301, G9000034222
OpenAlex ID: W4407099433
