Low correlation between visual discomfort image ratings and hypersensitivity questions is improved with functional questions
Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: • Questionnaires assessing visual discomfort often show low correlations with discomfort ratings to images or gratings. • This may be because people do not know how to calibrate their answers on a standard discomfort scale. • We compared standard discomfort ratings with novel functional questions which aim to aid calibration. • Correlation with questionnaire items about stripes and patterns improves using this approach. To assess visual discomfort, researchers can use questionnaires that require people to self-reflect on their real-world experiences, or researchers can present images and ask for ratings of discomfort while they are viewed. These two methods are conceptualised to measure a similar construct, but they tend to show surprisingly low correlation. A possible reason is that, when viewing the images, people do not know how to calibrate their answers on a standard discomfort scale, because it requires implicit comparison of one’s own perception with others (e.g., is my perception unusually uncomfortable?). Here we compared standard discomfort ratings with functional questions that aimed to aid calibration (e.g. I would need to immediately look away; I could tolerate it as a poster; I could live with it as wallpaper ). We found correlation with questionnaire questions about stripes and patterns improved with the functional style of question. We conclude that functional questions are helpful for assessing visual discomfort.
Source: Vision Research
Authors: Alice Price, Georgina Powell, Petroc Sumner
Institution: Cardiff University
Language: English
Subfield: Cognitive Neuroscience
Field: Neuroscience
Domain: Life Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $2,940
OpenAlex ID: W4407121236