Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: This study explores how ideology and legal reasoning intersect, using a unique network modelling approach to examine the vague legal concept of public order as a social representation. We find support for the assumption that while the core of public order is commonly agreed upon among lawyers, the periphery is variable and connected to ideology, especially Right-Wing Authoritarianism. In this regard, political beliefs seem to be linked with reasoning about some public order judgements, such as when assessing LGBTQ+ rights.
Source: Psychology Public Policy and Law
DOI: 10.1037/law0000449
Language: English
Subfield: Law
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: gold
OpenAlex ID: W4407702213
