Autopsy of a failed trial part 1: A qualitative investigation of clinician’s views on and experiences of the implementation of the DAISIES trial in UK-based intensive eating disorder services
Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: This article consists of a citation of a published article describing research funded by the Health Technology Assessment programme under project number 17/123/03, and is provided as as part of the complete record of research outputs for this project. The original publication is available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2975 Objective The DAISIES trial, comparing inpatient and stepped-care day patient treatment for adults with severe anorexia nervosa was prematurely terminated in March 2022 due to poor recruitment. This qualitative study seeks to understand the difficulties faced during the trial by investigating stakeholders’ views on and experiences of its implementation. Method Semi-structured interview and focus group transcripts, and trial management and oversight group meeting minutes from May 2020-June 2022 were analysed using thematic analysis. Participants were 47 clinicians and co-investigators involved with the DAISIES trial. The Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework was applied to the interpretive themes to classify barriers and facilitators to implementation. Results Five themes were identified: incompatible participation interests; changing standard practice; concerns around clinical management; systemic capacity and capability issues; and Covid-19 disrupting implementation. Applying the NASSS framework indicated the greatest implementation challenges to arise with the adopters (e.g. patients, clinicians), the organisational systems (e.g. service capacity), and the wider socio-political context (e.g. Covid-19 closing services). Conclusions Our findings emphasise the top-down impact of systemic-level research implementation challenges. The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic accentuated pre-existing organisational barriers to trial implementation within intensive eating disorder services, further limiting the capacity for research. Funding This publication was funded by the Health Technology Assessment programme as a part of award number 17/123/03. This article reports on one component of the research award A Randomised Controlled Multi-Centre Open-Label Parallel Group Non-Inferiority Trial of the Clinical Effectiveness, Acceptability and Cost-Effectiveness of a ‘Stepping into Day Treatment’ Approach versus Inpatient Treatment as Usual for Anorexia Nervosa in Adult Specialist Eating Disorder Services. For more information about this research please view the award page [https://fundingawards.nihr.ac.uk/award/17/123/03] DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2975
Source: Health Technology Assessment
DOI: 10.3310/qlhd7846
Authors: Başak İnce, Matthew D Phillips, Bethan Dalton, Madeleine Irish, Hannah Webb, Daniela Mercado, Catherine McCombie, Zohra Zenasni, James Shearer, Laura Potts, Gemma Peachey, Katie Au, Nikola Kern, Sam Clark-Stone, Frances Connan, A Louise Johnston, Stanimira Lazarova, Ewa Zadeh, Sophie Tomlin, Francesca Battisti, Konstantinos Ioannidis, Ciarán Newell, Tayeem Pathan, Jackie Wales, Rebecca Cashmore, Sandra Marshall, Jon Arcelus, Paul Robinson, Sarah Byford, Sabine Landau, Vanessa Lawrence, Hubertus Himmerich, Janet Treasure, Ulrike Schmidt
Institutions: King's College London, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, NHS Grampian, South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust, Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Dorset HealthCare University NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Glenfield Hospital, Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, University of Nottingham, Institute of Mental Health, University College London
Language: English
Subfield: General Health Professions
Field: Health Professions
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: diamond
Award: G1546879410
OpenAlex ID: W4407780174