Work

Comparative efficacy of acupuncture for chronic low back pain: A network meta-analysis

Year: 2025

Type: article

Study designs: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis

Abstract: A B S T R A C T Background Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) is a globally prevalent condition that significantly impairs quality of life and imposes a substantial burden on healthcare systems. While acupuncture is widely recognized for its therapeutic benefits, a comprehensive comparison of its efficacy across different modalities remains lacking. This network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluates the comparative effectiveness of acupuncture interventions for CNSLBP. Methods A systematic review and NMA were conducted conducted following PRISMA-NMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42024507870). Twelve databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and others, were searched up to January 15, 2024. Inclusion criteria: randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing acupuncture with placebo, sham, or active controls in adults with CNSLBP. Sixty-three RCTs (n=9,454) were included. Pain intensity and functional improvement were analyzed using a Bayesian framework. Risk of bias was assessed via ROB 2.0; evidence certainty was evaluated using GRADE methodology and CINeMA. Results The analysis revealed that individualized acupuncture (IA), routine acupuncture combined with traditional Chinese medicine, and lumbar-pelvic training with electroacupuncture (LP+EA) significantly reduced pain intensity compared to placebo. For example, IA showed a mean difference (MD) of -11 mm (95% credible interval [CrI]: -15.6 to -6.4) on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold of 10–15 mm. LP+EA also significantly improved functional capacity, with a mean difference of -11.7 points (95% CrI: -15.3 to -8.1) on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), approaching the MCID of 10 points. Multimodal therapies were generally more effective than single modalities, showing superior results in both pain relief and functional improvement. Subgroup analyses indicated optimal results with 6–12 weeks of intervention and greater functional improvements in younger patients (<50 years). Heterogeneity was moderate (I 2 = 49.6%). Limitations include variability in acupuncture protocols (e.g., needle depth, session frequency) and follow-up durations (range: 2 weeks to 12 months). Conclusion This study highlights the effectiveness of acupuncture, particularly when combined with complementary therapies such as traditional Chinese medicine, education, or exercise, in managing chronic non-specific low back pain. The findings demonstrate that these interventions provide clinically meaningful reductions in pain intensity and improvements in functional capacity, as evidenced by conversions to familiar units (VAS and ODI) and anchoring to MCID thresholds. These findings underscore the value of multimodal and individualized treatment strategies. Standardized protocols and long-term trials are needed to strengthen evidence.

Source: Heliyon

DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e43132

Authors: Feng Gao, Dongming Jia, Shengxia Xue

Institutions: Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang Police Vocational Academy, Third People's Hospital of Hangzhou

Language: English

Topic: Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies

Subfield: Complementary and alternative medicine

Field: Medicine

Domain: Health Sciences

SDG: Good health and well-being

Open Access status: gold

Estimated APC paid: $2,270