Year: 2025
Type: conference-paper
Abstract: Background Deciding which patients should be prioritised for admission to an in-patient hospice from different referral sources, when the number of referrals exceeds the number of available beds, can be challenging to get right. Aims To improve the identification of patients with the greatest specialist palliative care needs and reduce the time from referral to hospice admission for these patients. Methods The measures used were the mean, range and standard deviation of waiting time from referral to admission in days. Each week, this data was calculated for urgent and non-urgent admissions separately – urgency was determined retrospectively from the electronic patient record following admission. Baseline data was collected over 2-months and a further two rounds of data after each intervention. The interventions constituted introduction of daily Teams meeting with referrers and implementation of a validated triaging tool called RUN-PC. Results Average time from referral to admission at baseline was 2 days (SD of 2.5) for urgent patients and 3.5 days (SD of 3.5 days) for non-urgent. This improved following implementation of the daily Teams meeting and improved further still to 1.4 days (SD 1.7 days) for urgent patients and 3 days (SD of 3) for non-urgent patients. Conclusion Daily discussions with referrers and implementation of a validated triaging tool have been well received by hospice staff and referrers alike and have reduced the time between referral and admission for all patients but more significantly for the admissions categorised as urgent.
Source: Poster presentations
Authors: Fiona Clift, Siwan Seaman
Institution: Marie Curie
Language: English
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: bronze
OpenAlex ID: W4408550584