Work

Feasibility of Round Window Exposure via External Auditory Canal: Classification and Predictive Landmarks

Year: 2025

Type: article

Abstract: ABSTRACT Objective To clarify the feasibility and the anatomical characteristics related to round window exposure via the external auditory canal (EAC) without bony removal. Methods Surgical videos and radiological data from 50 adult patients who underwent endoscopic tympanoplasty type I were collected. According to surgical videos, round window niche (RWN) exposure was classified as “Certainly,” “Possibly,” and “None,” and round window membrane (RWM) exposure was classified as “Clear visualization,” “Incomplete visualization,” “Just perceptible” and “Invisible.” Basing on CT reconstruction, distances among RWM, RWN, tympanic annulus (TA), width, and orientation of scala tympani (ST) were measured under the Coordinate System of Cochlea, and anatomic features of EAC under the Coordinate System of EAC. Results 60% of RWNs were “Certainly,” 24% “Possibly,” and 16% “None” exposed. RWM exposure was 32% “Clear visualization,” 22% “Incomplete visualization,” 14% “Just perceptible,” and 32% “Invisible.” Longer distances between RWM and TA (RWM‐TA), and the Width of ST in x and z sections were related to RWM exposure (RWM‐TA: Spearman‐r = 0.663, p < 0.001, ST in x: Spearman‐r = −0.337, p = 0.017, z: Spearman‐r = −0.586, p < 0.001). RWM‐TA longer than 7.06 mm indicated a possibility of RWM exposure (AUC = 0.784, p = 0.011). Widths of ST in x and z sections shorter than 1.85 mm and 1.84 mm, respectively, indicated better RWM exposure (AUC = 0.887, p < 0.001). The size of EAC in axial and coronal sections could significantly predict RWM exposure (axial: AUC = 0.726, p = 0.011, coronal: AUC = 0.798, p = 0.001). Conclusion In adults, 54% of RWM could be partially visualized via EAC without bony removal. There are reliable pre‐operative predictors for RWM exposure, which are helpful for future inner ear therapy. Level of Evidence 3

Source: Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

DOI: 10.1002/lio2.70127