Work

Life cycle assessment of solid recovered fuel (SRF) for energy sector in declining coal region: Environmental burden of SRF production

Year: 2025

Type: article

Abstract: • Solid recovered fuel production is investigated through thorough LCA analysis. • PEF 3.0 method was applied to determine the environmental impacts. • Environmental Footprint (EF 3.0) for SRF production was 2.65 × 10 4 in this study. • Plastics contributed 77.2 % to climate change, the most significant impact. This study provides a comprehensive insight into solid recovered fuel (SRF) production and its potential as a coal supplement in the post-coal region of Moravia-Silesia, Czech Republic. Such studies on waste-to-energy (WtE) applications are often lacking, particularly at critical moments when decisions about regional energy strategies are being made. As a result, viable and less environmentally harmful pathways stand outside consideration. In this study, SRF production is investigated using life cycle assessment (LCA), applying the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) methodology with data from EF 3.0, ELCD and Ecoinvent 3.8. A scenario analysis was also conducted on transport modes and distances. The initial region-oriented scheme of the LCA study included the following steps: separation of waste material, transport to a processing plant, SRF production, and transport to an energy facility. The results present the overall environmental burden associated with SRF production. The most significant impact is observed in “climate change” indicator, accounting for 78 % of the total impact. The primary contributors to the impact are plastics (77.2 %), wood (13.5 %), coal (3.1 %), and transport (2.1 %). The scenario analysis, covering transport distances of 200–400 km, clearly demonstrated that rail transport is a more environmentally friendly option compared to road transport, with minimal sensitivity to variations in distance within the evaluated range. This study uncovers unique insights into alternative SRF production and evaluates its environmental burden through available interpretations.

Source: Energy Conversion and Management X

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.100989